|
Saturday, 11 February 2012 03:13 |
|

"With stunning sets, larger than life characters, and classic songs, this show was uplifting in its telling of the love between Belle and the Beast."
Stage Review
Show: Beauty and the Beast
Presented by: NETworks
Director: Rob Roth
Choreographer: Matt West
Starring: Emily Behny, Dane Agostinis, Logan Denninghoff, Andrew Kruep, Julia Louise Hosack, Michael Haller, James May, Chandon Jones, Christopher Spencer, Jen Bechter, Noah Jones, Jordan Moore, Matt Kopec
Venue: Queen Elizabeth Theatre
Run: Feb 8-12 2012
    
Reviewed by: Tessa Perkins
With stunning sets, larger than life characters, and classic songs, this show was uplifting in its telling of the love between Belle and the Beast. The show had us enthralled from rousing songs like “Be Our Guest” to the heartfelt “If I Can’t Love Her.” Full of humour and emotion, the show went by so quickly and entertained young and old alike.
The many characters in the Beast’s castle are all quite funny, but I thought Lumiere (Haller) did an excellent job as the dashing French candelabra, and I adored Mrs. Potts (Hosack) who always had tea ready to help everyone through their problems. Her son Chip was also very cute as his head stuck out of a tea cart and he yearned to be human again so he wouldn’t have to sleep in the cupboard.
Madame de la Grande Bouche (Bechter) had a wonderful costume that made her the width of a chest of drawers and allowed her to pull things out of flaps beside her hips as if she really did have a lot of storage. Cogsworth (May), with his strict attitude, also had a great costume complete with a winding knob on his back and pendulum in the front. Lumiere’s hands lit up when needed, and added to his personality. He also added a lot of sexual innuendo to the show as he chased Babette the feather duster (Chandon Jones) around.
My favourite song of the night, and the one stuck in my head after the show, was “Be Our Guest,” champagne bottles. It was a spectacular number. I also really liked “Gaston” which featured metal beer mugs that the dancers clinked together in time with the music and did some neat choreography involving the clanging of their mugs. This song also illustrated just how pompous Gaston’s character really is. Logan Denninghoff was wonderful in this role as he tried to manipulate Belle into marrying him.
One thing the Beast (Agostinis) and Gaston have in common at first is their desire to control Belle. Eventually the Beast becomes more gentlemanly and kind, but when she first arrives at the castle he won’t let her eat if she won’t join him for dinner in a scene reminiscent of The Taming of the Shrew. I find it a bit difficult to buy the fact that Belle falls in love with the Beast who had her father as a prisoner and then traded him for her. Their best scene together was in the castle library as she reads him King Arthur and they realise that they have something in common. Belle (Behny) also has a very beautiful voice and conveys the emotions of the distraught Belle very well.
One thing I didn’t really enjoy about the show was the cheesy humour at times, and the slapstick stunts of Gaston’s sidekick, Lefou (Kruep), who fell down and got slapped in the face countless times during the show. Some of the songs didn’t seem as genuine or sincere as others, but for the most part, I think all the performers put on an amazing show.
The colourful sets and costumes were absolutely brilliant. I especially liked the components of the castle like the staircase that were moved by strange creatures that gave everything an even more enchanted feel. The show was magical, and especially if you grew up loving Belle, this is a show you’d be sorry to miss.
|
|
|
Friday, 10 February 2012 13:44 |
|
Cruel and Tender lacks emotional depth despite the talented cast.
Stage Review
Production: Cruel and Tender
Author: Martin Crimp
Company: Canadian Stage
Director: Atom Egoyan
Principal Actors: Arsinée Khanijian, Daniel Kash, Abena Malika, Jeff Lillico
Venue: Bluma Appel Theatre
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Run: January 21 to February 18, 2012
    
Reviewed by James Karas
If you are searching for Greek tragedy in Toronto, you probably won't be surprised to find none, but may=y we say “almost” none? Canadian Stage has brought something akin to it in the form of Martin Crimp’s adaptation of Sophocles’ Women of Trachis. Entitled play Cruel and Tender Crimp's adaotation is now playing at the Bluma Appel Theatre.
Sophocles’ play tells the story of Heracles and his wife Deianira who inadvertently poisons him when she attempts to win back his love. Heracles is away waging war but his objective is a woman, Iole, who is not a simple conquest. To make sure that Heracles remained faithful to her, Deianira gave him a tunic soaked in the blood of a centaur. But instead of acting like a love charm, the tunic caused unbearable pain that spelled the end of the great hero.
Crimp is reasonably faithful to Sophocles’ play. Amelia (Arsinée Khanijian) lives near an airport and is waiting for her husband The General (Daniel Kash), to return from the war on terror that he is waging. As with Heracles, however, the General’s objective is a woman, Laela (Abena Malika), and not the rooting out of terrorism. In fact Laela is brought to the General’s home as a war victim-cum-trophy.
Amelia is worried about her husband’s feelings for her and pours the contents of a vial on The General’s pillow having been promised by a chemist that the chemical will restore her husband’s fidelity. It causes excruciating pain instead.
The performance lasts ninety minutes and the first two thirds are dominated by Amelia who is anxiously waiting for the return of her husband. Khanijian, directed by her husband Atom Egoyan, gives a highly physical performance. She uses her hands, arms and body almost constantly. She seems to be conducting herself as she delivers her lines. The interesting part is that there is relatively little emotional depth in her performance or in the entire production.
Sophocles’ Chorus of Women of Trachis is replaced by a Physiotherapist (Cara Rickets) and a beautician (Sarah Wilson) and they are joined by the Housekeeper (Brenda Robins). Other characters include Jonathan, a government minister (Nigel Shawn Williams), and a journalist named Richard (Thomas Hauff). The Chorus and these characters deliver most of their lines like messengers. There is scant emotional involvement.
The General’s son James (Jeff Lillico) does show some emotion but what he and Laela have to offer amounts to relatively little.
In the final half hour we see The General who is in agony and more or less demented. Kash invests his performance with pain and emotion and we are given projected close ups of his contorted face.
The single set consists of stark off-white walls with narrow windows at the top and a staircase in the middle. There are almost no props except for a chair.
The opening line of the play, delivered by Amelia speaking to the audience, is: “There are women who believe that all men are rapists.” She does not believe that and there is no evidence in the play to support that proposition. True, her husband is waging war for a woman but his means of acquiring her is military conquest not rape.
Crimp has done a reasonable job of being faithful to the plot of Women of Trachis and transferring it to the 21st century. Egoyan delivers a cerebral production which despite some dramatic acting by Khanijian and Kash, I found surprisingly unmoving. What a waste of talent.
|
|
Thursday, 09 February 2012 13:53 |
|
The strands of The Golden Dragon's plot move slowly and the action is slow and tortuous.

Stage Review
Production: The Golden Dragon
Author: Roland Schimmelpfennig
Company: Tarragon Theatre
Director: Ross Manson
Principal Actors: David Fox, Lili Francks, Tony Nappo, Anusree Roy, David Yee
Venue: Tarragon Theatre
Location: Toronto, Ontario.
Run: January 18 to February 19, 2012
    
Reviewed by James Karas
One of the many plot lines of The Golden Dragon, Roland Schimmelpfennig’s play now showing at the Tarragon Theatre, is that of a boy with a toothache. He screams in agony a number of times until the tooth is removed by a kitchen worker using crude pliers. Although the play does have some interesting turns and flashes of theatricality, the ninety minutes it takes to watch it were about as pleasant as a visit to the dentist.
The play takes place mostly in the kitchen of The Golden Dragon a Chinese/Thai/Vietnamese restaurant and requires five actors who play a large number of roles. The characters are describe as A Man Over Sixty (David Fox), A Woman Over Sixty (Lili Francks), A Man (Tony Nappo), A young Woman (Anusree Roy) and a Young Man (David Yee) but that is of little help in terms of the characters that we will meet and the roles played by the actors.
All five work in the kitchen and they will play a number of parts in the various strands of the plot that Schimmelpfennig devises. Two men will become flight attendants whom we see in the restaurant and their apartment. One of them will find the boy’s bloody extracted tooth in her soup and eventually put it in her mouth.
The boy will bleed to death and he will be wrapped in a carpet and disposed of in a river.
We will hear the story of an ant and a cricket, the tale of the people in the apartment upstairs and the goings-on in the busy kitchen. The action will move quickly from one plot strand to another until the 90 minutes are finally up.
The set for all this activity is on and around a raised platform in the middle of the theatre with the audience seated on both sides. The actors put on white aprons at the beginning when they are in the kitchen and make small changes during the performance such as the flight attendants putting on wigs to indicate the blonde and the brunette and wrapping on a red blanket to indicate the woman in the red dress.
Schimmelpfennig is not interested in any realistic portrayal and the characters frequently (and annoyingly) punctuate their speech with “pause” and "short pause”. He wants us to know that we are being told a story and not watching a representation of a tale.
There are a few laughs scattered here and there and the image of people in the hole of the tooth is quite arresting. But by the time you get there, you are bored out of your mind. The strands of plot move slowly, the screaming boy becomes annoying, the action is slow and tortuous. Is it the production or the play? I am not sure.
A few words about the playwright. According to Ross Manson, who directs the production, “Schimmelpfennig is the most produced living playwright in Europe.” He has received numerous awards for his plays and The Golden Dragon won the Muhlheimer Dramatists Award and was selected as Theater Heute’s Play of the Year in 2010. Clearly some critics saw qualities and virtues in the play that simply eluded me. Schimmelpfennig writes in German and what we see is a translation by David Tushingham.
I really cannot complain about the talents of the actors or their ability to move swiftly from one character to another and to give, in the end, impressive performances. Perhaps the transatlantic and translingual voyage has made an awards-winning play into a pretentious bore.
|
|
Thursday, 09 February 2012 13:10 |
|
Asha and Ravi Jain share their stories without pretending to be anyone else but the mother and son that they are.
Stage Review
Production: A Brimful of Asha
Author: Asha and Ravi Jain
Company: Why Not Theatre
Director: Ravi Jain
Principal Actors: Asha Jain and Ravi Jain
Venue: Tarragon Theatre
Location: Toronto, Ontario.
Run: January 26 to February 26, 2012
    
Reviewed by James Karas
One definition of theatre is that it is a representation of reality. Actors pretend to be other people and we suspend our disbelief and accept them as the characters that they are supposed to represent.
When someone gets up on the stage and does not pretend to be anyone but himself then he is not “acting” but simply presenting or representing tales from his life. That is what A Brimful of Asha, now playing at the Tarragon Theatre, is all about. Asha and Ravi Jain tell us some amusing incidents from their lives without pretending to be anyone else but the mother and son that they are.
Asha Jain is Indian and she was married by arrangement to a man who became a successful businessman in Canada. On stage and - we presume - in “real” life, she is a simple woman who has strong, traditional views about love, marriage, the position of children and life in general. She wants her son Ravi to get married and settle down. The woman he marries, needless to say, must be Indian and preferably one that his parents have arranged for him or, at least, approve of.
Ravi does not share all of those views. The younger generation not agreeing with the world view of their parents is one of the mainstays of comedy. In this case however the generational gap differences are supplemented with cultural differences and that, in the hands of a talented writer, can be a source of even more humour.
In the normal course of events, children grow up and marry. But the Indian way provides an additional curl: as far as Asha is concerned, the spouse of the single young person is found, examined, negotiated and settled upon by the parents.
Which brings us to Ravi. He goes in for theatre studies, flies off to Greece and does not obey the natural course of settling down with a wife and a mortgage as his mother wants him to. Enter the Indian modus operandi for connubial bliss: take him to India and find him a wife.

Ravi and Asha tell us what happened when they went to India (he for a visit, she and her husband for wife-hunting). Ravi is a professional actor, a good story teller and knows how to work an audience. His mother is not an actor which means she does not project or enunciate and makes numerous mistakes because her English is not perfect. But she is a loving mother who wants to see her son settled and she is advertently and inadvertently hilarious.
The two of them simply tell us what happened in India as the parents went from one marital prospect to another and all of them were unsuccessful.
I have never seen an audience that is so warm and receptive to what is happening on the stage. All, I assume, agreed with Ravi that he has the right to find his own wife based on love and whatever else makes people jump into matrimony. But emotionally, the audience was with Asha. They simply loved this woman who has been happily married for thirty-eight years and believes that love grows after marriage rather than diminish.
Ravi will no doubt choose his own wife and not allow his parents to choose for him. But will he choose the right one? Maybe he should just listen to his mother.
This Why Not Theatre production is directed by Ravi Jain and even if he can’t find a wife we must give him credit for his marvelous writing, acting and directorial talent.
|
|
Tuesday, 07 February 2012 01:38 |
|
Calendar Girls is funny, rich in character and storyline, with moments of intense emotion.
Theatre Review
Production: Calendar Girls
Writer: Tim Firth (Based on the motion picture by Juliette Towhidi and Tim Firth)
Director: Rachel Ditor
Starring: Shirley Broderick, Anna Galvin, Aslam Husain, Shawn Macdonald, David Marr, Jane Noble, Wendy Noel, Lisa Norton, Linda Quibell, Kerry Sandomirsky, Colleen Winton
Running: Until February 26, 2012
Venue: Stanely Industrial Alliance Theatre
   
Reviewed by Taryn Hubbard (Vancouver)
A charming story of a group of women who belong to the Women’s Institute in Yorkshire England, Calendar Girls is a production that cleverly brings together themes of age, sexuality, illness, and friendship.
Between riveting slideshows about mysterious vegetables such as broccoli, or teaching tai chi out of a step-by-step book, the sassy members of the WI are clearly more committed to the friendships found in the group than to the stuffy activities that take place at meetings.
But when Annie’s (Wendy Noel) husband John (Shawn Macdonald) gets diagnosed with leukemia, the women decide to honour John by raising enough money from their annual calendar sales to buy a £500 chair for the hospital. Going against the usual Yorkshire landscape-themed calendar, these daring women decide to show off exactly what makes them the women of the WI and pose nude in a variety of different poses—with baking, knitting, jam, and tea sets. The calendar is an instant international success and all of a sudden this quaint women’s group is faced with the pressures of fame.
The high-energy ensemble cast is fantastic. The scene when the women are shooting the calendar—which is in the nude, not naked as Chris (Anna Galvin) likes to remind them—was one of the best in the play. The actors, who actually did bare all, looked like they were having a lot of genuine fun.
Calendar Girls is a great show. It’s funny, rich in character and storyline, and also has moments of intense emotion. It is a great example of how women of a “certain age” can subvert agist stereotypes and love their bodies no matter how “old” they may be.
Calendar Girls runs at the Stanley Industrial Alliance Theatre now until Feb. 26.
|
|
|